|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:35:54 GMT -5
Okay... I'll fess up.. I have a weakness. Serial number on this one makes it made right at the time these got named 17s. The model number would be marked on the frame under the crane. No model number on this one.
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:36:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:38:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:38:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:39:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:39:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:39:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:40:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:40:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:40:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:40:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:41:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:41:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Jun 27, 2024 13:41:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bradshaw on Jun 29, 2024 9:01:16 GMT -5
Stan.... not aware of any difference between a pre-Model 17 K-22 and a Model 17 K-22. Upper side plate screw absent on both. Both have the better CYLINDER STOP arrangement activated by spring-loaded plunger, secured by a screw in front of the trigger guard. Both feature burnished, tapered chambers, exceedingly close chamber-to-bore alignment, superb barrels with correctly fine forcing cones. Both shoot straight as fury and make great single & double action revolvers. Both incorporate the post-war hammer & trigger and superior, post-war adjustable sights. Both exemplify cream manufacturing. The term “K-22” includes at least the early Model 17’s. David Bradshaw
|
|