jeffh
.375 Atomic
Posts: 1,749
|
Post by jeffh on Jan 15, 2024 10:57:27 GMT -5
Guys, these single-digit temps, even as the wind has subsided considerably, are EXTREMELY DANGEROUS!
I've not been inclined to go out there and revel in the danger in deference to sitting inside and.... "shopping."
I've been looking at the possibilities of a new barrel or even a rechamber, dies, load data, saw a killer deal on a new 180 grain mould with HP, FP and cup-point pins,... mentally spending money.
Actually, before the day was out yesterday, I ended up ordering 2k small pistol primers. I was shopping for LARGE RIFLE, but...
Like I said, single-digit temps, combined with high winds are extremely dangerous.
Single-digit temps, combined with high winds AND someone starting an infectious project are exponentially MORE dangerous.
|
|
|
|
Post by x101airborne on Jan 15, 2024 17:18:06 GMT -5
We were 19 this morning and supposed to be 16 to 17 depending on who you believe. Too many cattle to feed daily but did go shopping for some 224 Valkyrie 90 grain soft point and wound up with 1K 5.56 55 grain soft point. Eh, I have my vices.
|
|
|
|
Post by bullseye on Jan 19, 2024 19:13:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Encore64 on Jan 19, 2024 19:21:15 GMT -5
That's great. I'd already determined the Lipseys Site was incorrect about the twist rate. I did the cleaning rod one revolution thing.
I'm so glad to see this as a standard offering.
|
|
|
|
Post by revolvercranker on Jan 19, 2024 22:31:15 GMT -5
That's great. I'd already determined the Lipseys Site was incorrect about the twist rate. I did the cleaning rod one revolution thing. I'm so glad to see this as a standard offering. So what twist did you figure it at? |
|
|
|
Post by Encore64 on Jan 19, 2024 22:35:28 GMT -5
Just marking a cleaning rod, it made almost two revolutions before exiting the muzzle.
Henry says 1-12" and I figure their data is correct.
If course, I doubt I ever shoot really heavy bullets. I'll see how this thing shoots soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by revolvercranker on Jan 19, 2024 22:37:06 GMT -5
Just marking a cleaning rod, it made almost two revolutions before exiting the muzzle. Henry says 1-12" and I figure their data is correct. If course, I doubt I ever shoot really heavy bullets. I'll see how this thing shoots soon. WOW! That's really slow Encore. Have you shot it yet? I might have missed it, how long it the barrel? Tony |
|
|
|
Post by leftysixgun on Jan 20, 2024 2:24:04 GMT -5
Im very curious as how it shoots. Im a fan of the 35 cal “rifle” cartridges
|
|
eskimo36
.375 Atomic
Oklahoma
Posts: 2,072
|
Post by eskimo36 on Jan 20, 2024 4:35:11 GMT -5
Just marking a cleaning rod, it made almost two revolutions before exiting the muzzle. Henry says 1-12" and I figure their data is correct. If course, I doubt I ever shoot really heavy bullets. I'll see how this thing shoots soon. WOW! That's really slow Encore. Have you shot it yet? I might have missed it, how long it the barrel? Tony 1-12” in most rifle calibers is slow but in 35 caliber, as in a 35 Whelen, 1-12” shoots up to 250gr bullets accurately. There are very few, if any, 35 caliber factory guns faster twisted. |
|
|
|
Post by Encore64 on Jan 20, 2024 6:45:52 GMT -5
Barrel Length 22"
Rate of Twist 1:12
Overall Length 37.5"
Weight 6.69 lbs.
The above is copied from Henry's Website.
The 1-12" will be more than adequate for any available 35 Caliber Bullets.
|
|
|
|
Post by revolvercranker on Jan 20, 2024 12:05:09 GMT -5
1-12” in most rifle calibers is slow but in 35 caliber, as in a 35 Whelen, 1-12” shoots up to 250gr bullets accurately. There are very few, if any, 35 caliber factory guns faster twisted. Eskimo36 I believe you're right. Here's what I think about the bigger caliber, and is just an assumption. I think the ratio of the diameter of the bullet in relation to the length of the bullet is smaller in larger calibers then smaller calibers and that may be the difference why larger can get away with a slower twist. Would like to hear what a ballitician says about that. I just recently of a few years ago got a custom built 35 Whelen on a 1903 Springfield action. The rifle many have been built by A.O. Niedner and I did check the twist and can't remember but it was faster then average. I want to say 10. I'm going to check it again. |
|
|
|
Post by Encore64 on Jan 20, 2024 12:20:29 GMT -5
Picked up the 2024 Hodgdon's Reloading Manual this morning.
Not only does it have extensive new data, but also a lengthy, well written article on reloading the 360 Buckhammer.
|
|
|
|
Post by revolvercranker on Jan 20, 2024 12:21:45 GMT -5
That's good to know Encore, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Encore64 on Jan 28, 2024 15:34:53 GMT -5
Did cast bullet loads today in this gun. Results posted in the Reloading Section.
But, in the spirit of honest reviewing, I wanted to post here about the gun.
At first, I thought I had a problem with the rifle.
The first shot misfired, so I waited a few seconds before removing the loaded round. The primer was barely dented.
So, I reloaded it and it fired just fine. But, a second anomaly presented itself. The primer had backed out about .010".
The third time I fired the gun, the primer also backed out a tiny amount.
Having decades of experience with Contenders, I've seen this before.
So, I tried the same solution on the Henry. I stood up between shoots and closed the Henry with more authority.
The problem vanished and the gun functioned perfectly. By time I fired 10 or 12 rds, the locking bolt was seating fine and no other problems were experience.
Just the sign of everything being fit really tight.
At the end of session, I closed the gun as gently as I could and it was working just fine.
Gun produced 1.5" groups at 72 yards with a 4x Scope. This particular scope has an extremely thick reticle which I wanted for woods hunting.
I'm well pleased with the setup...
|
|
|
|
Post by x101airborne on Jan 29, 2024 20:02:07 GMT -5
The EGW Scope Base came in today. I had the scope and rings. All went together nicely. As I posted, you have to remove the rear sight to use this base. I've got Marbles Blanks on the way. That'll be easy enough to finish once it arrives. Sir, out of ignorance may I ask (and I have not done this yet myself) do you think anything would be wrong with just turning the rear sight 180 degrees and putting it back in? I have taken the rear sight off of so many weapons I cannot remember and half of those rear sights I have lost. I lament every one lost. This is a new thought of mine so please excuse me if I have asked a silly question. I dont have an appropriate weapon available to measure. |
|
