S&W 69..44mag

[aciera]

May 5, 2024 8:02:56 GMT -5 bula said:

Your ramblings make more sense than mine and nobody has dinged me yet. I've nothing here in 41 or 45, earlier in thread a wish for a 41mag version was mentioned. This seems a worthy thing too. 

Thanks. I totally agree on the 41!!!
Maybe I’ll try bushing one…….
Or maybe a S&W 296…….but still more numbers crunching ……I have one with a SS cylinder to try. Adding strength instead of weakening a cylinder ……..works both ways
I have a 38 Charter Arms snubby in 38 to try it on. Making a 327. If it works I’ll do a Smith
Smith makes the J frame in 6 shot 32 H&R so weak wall for the 327. 5 is better
I obsess about things.
You know Murphy’s Law…..
Anything that can possibly go wrong will…..at the worst possible time……..
My thoughts……..Murphy was an optimist…….

[rkcohen]

i decided to go "lighter" for my hip carry while trying to keep as much punch as i could.

now, i have a 69 and kenny gave me a lot of help!

www.rugerforum.net/threads/catching-hell-for-dating-a-girl-from-the-other-side-of-the-tracks.410594/?post_id=4874339#post-4874339