|
|
Post by rjm52 on Mar 2, 2023 7:11:31 GMT -5
|
|
eskimo36
.375 Atomic
Oklahoma
Posts: 2,049
|
Post by eskimo36 on Mar 2, 2023 7:34:41 GMT -5
Even with the porting, it’s a fine looking gun.
|
|
|
|
Post by rjm52 on Mar 2, 2023 8:25:51 GMT -5
If it was a 4 5/8" I would be bidding on it... That finish is probably MetalLife hard chrome... And I like Mag-Na-Port...have several guns with it including a 6" FA 83 and a gun with it makes no difference to me...
|
|
|
|
Post by bigbrowndog on Mar 2, 2023 9:07:51 GMT -5
Custom and no provenance as to who did the work is a pet peeve for me, along with pics not showing details, like cylinder face, muzzle, tops and bottoms, bore, etc. It is a very good looking gun and appears well done.
Trapr
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee Martin on Mar 2, 2023 10:03:31 GMT -5
The serial number puts it as a 1984 built .41 Magnum. Likely a 6.5" shortened and ported, hard-chromed, ejector housing de-annodized, Super Blackhawk grip and hammer added, and target rear sight. Not a bad looking piece. It could use better fitting grips and a steel ejector housing, but that's just me. -Lee www.singleactions.com"Chasing perfection five shots at a time" |
|
|
|
Post by Big Bore on Mar 2, 2023 12:31:40 GMT -5
That gun shop is about 20 minutes from me. Must..stay..away..
|
|
|
|
Post by z1r on Mar 2, 2023 13:19:22 GMT -5
Off topic, but that's the shop I bought my first Ruger from in 1896, a SS 7.5" SBH.
|
|
|
|
Post by bisleyfan41 on Mar 2, 2023 14:13:49 GMT -5
Off topic, but that's the shop I bought my first Ruger from in 1896, a SS 7.5" SBH. Man, that's a long time ago! 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by z1r on Mar 2, 2023 16:46:38 GMT -5
Clearly, it was a pre-production model.
|
|
