gsp7
.30 Stingray
Posts: 421 
|
Post by gsp7 on Aug 8, 2010 22:45:58 GMT -5
What is a "number 5 grip frame"?
Dont see any reference to it on the gunblast grip frame article
|
|
|
|
Post by taffin on Aug 8, 2010 22:58:01 GMT -5
GO TO www.sixguns.com, CLICK ON "MR. KEITH'S CORNER" AND READ THE FIRST ARTICLE CALLED "THE LAST WORD" |
|
|
|
Post by Boge Quinn on Aug 8, 2010 23:03:07 GMT -5
What is a "number 5 grip frame"? Dont see any reference to it on the gunblast grip frame article That's because it's not a Ruger grip frame. Read the Keith article. Here's a pic of a Texas Longhorn Arms #5:  |
|
|
|
Post by kings6 on Aug 8, 2010 23:42:31 GMT -5
This is a Power Custom version of the #5.  |
|
gsp7
.30 Stingray
Posts: 421
|
Post by gsp7 on Aug 9, 2010 0:19:45 GMT -5
|
|
Len
.30 Stingray
Posts: 358
|
Post by Len on Aug 9, 2010 7:38:44 GMT -5
I think as suggested you need to read Keith's article as he tells how they created it using I believe a standard Colt front strap combined with a Colt Bisley back strap. I have a knock off how accurate it is to the original I have no way of knowing it looks the same but most important it fits my hand better than any other single action standard or modified grip I have tried.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary @ R&G on Aug 9, 2010 7:43:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Terry on Aug 11, 2010 14:59:02 GMT -5
...and this is the genuine article:  Of course, I have never (and never will) held the #5 in my hands. I read and heard it said that the #5 is a concept, that of the melding of a standard Colt and Colt Bisley grip frame, and may be different in some respects depending on who is making the decisions. There are probably slight and minor differences in the Powers, TLA, and Mr. Keith's #5 grip frame. The Ruger Bisley is probably the closest mass produced grip frame and sufficient for most of us for a while. |
|
gsp7
.30 Stingray
Posts: 421
|
Post by gsp7 on Aug 11, 2010 18:52:58 GMT -5
Hey thanks guys for the pictures, Yes I read the Kieth article right after Taffin posted . I am familiar with RF Sedgley and his springfield sporter work etc
Thanks
Rick
|
|
|
|
Post by bigmuddy on Aug 17, 2010 16:56:29 GMT -5
Kings6...WOW that gun looks FANTASTIC! Hope it shoots as good as it looks.
Mark, the Ruger Bisley is quite a bit different in feel and shape. The Power #5 frame was copied from an actual tracing taken from the "original".
|
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Aug 17, 2010 21:29:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by boxhead on Aug 18, 2010 0:25:21 GMT -5
Couldn't agree more Axe. With hindsight, Elmer was often missing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by AxeHandle on Aug 18, 2010 7:31:08 GMT -5
I don't know that "missing it" is the appropriate phrase there Box... Keith's number 5 was his "Last Word." In my head the creation of a "Number 5" should be a pretty personal thing... We can celebrate the man and make copies of his "Number 5" or we can embrace the concept and each make our own! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by bigmuddy on Aug 18, 2010 17:06:19 GMT -5
I don't know that "missing it" is the appropriate phrase there Box... Keith's number 5 was his "Last Word." In my head the creation of a "Number 5" should be a pretty personal thing... We can celebrate the man and make copies of his "Number 5" or we can embrace the concept and each make our own! ;D Well said Axe. I agree the Bisley works great for the "heavies". I have not used a number 5 for anything more than 44 specials at 1200 fps (250 gr bullet). It is quite comfortable at that level, and to me points better too. I think the #5 carries better, bit less weight on top or above the holster. Might just be me though. Remember that Elmer when writing about the Ruger Super Blackhawk said it was the best single action he had ever used. That was much after his #5 came to be. The #5 was not created to shoot the big boomers we have today. Again I like the way Axe put it.... |
|
caryc
.375 Atomic
Posts: 1,051
|
Post by caryc on Aug 30, 2010 10:42:10 GMT -5
I've shot my Reeder #5 along side a custom Gallagher Bisley Ruger... For me the Bisley is much more comfortable with heavier loads.  It's a beautiful gun but I don't quite understand that big hump on the bottom of the hammer on this one and Keith's gun. It just doesn't fit with the lines of the gun. The only thing I can think of is that it keeps the hammer slot in the grip frame filled up no matter what position the hammer is in. |
|
