Post by tinkerpearce on Jan 22, 2020 0:15:54 GMT -5
I've been testing a lot of obsolete calibers lately with my new Caldwell Chronograph. It's been interesting. I started the tests using my S&W .38 Safety Hammerless 4th Model and a Harrington and Richardson .38 Hammerless with a 3-1/4" barrel. The H&R turned out to be a 'slow gun,' consistently achieving lower velocities than the S&W, despite having a barrel twice as long.
For this series of tests I replaced the H&R with a S&W .38 Double Action 2nd Model with a 3-1/4" barrel, and this worked as you would expect, with the longer barrel yielding higher velocities.
We’ll start with listing the Winchester factory ammo for comparison.
Winchester 145gr. (modern) factory ammunition
S&W- 1-5/8″ barrel- 535 fps. 92 ft./lbs SD: 39
H&R- 3-1/4″ barrel- 478 fps. 74 ft./lbs SD: 42
Deeply unimpressive, and one of the reasons for this became plain when I pulled several of the bullets to try a different load under them. They are not .361″. They are not .357″. They average .352″! This was consistent across all fifteen bullets that I pulled, and may go a ways towards explaining the results of this first load-
Winchester 145gr RNL, 2.8gr. Unique, CCI500 primer
S&W 3-1/4″ barrel- 540 fps. 94 ft/lbs SD: 28
This performance is similar to the results for firing the factory ammo through the 1-5/8″ gun last time, and the bullets keyholed at 7 yards. I didn’t even bother to test them out of the shorter gun. Next…!
160gr. .361 LSWC, 2.7gr. Unique, CCI500 primer
S&W 3-1/4″ barrel- 754 fps. 202 ft./lbs SD: 24
S&W 1-5/8″ Barrel- 722 fps. 185 ft/lbs SD: 31
This load, while still considered safe for top-break revolvers, doubles the power of the factory load, and is my new defensive load for this caliber. I will restrict this to my S&Ws, though. They are of high enough quality to handle this load, but even they won’t be getting it as a steady diet; there’s simply no need to risk beating up an antique gun when practice and recreational shooting can be accomplished with milder loads.
This week I'll be testing some Triple-7 FFFg (a black powder substitute) loads intended to replicate the original performance of some old cartridges, including .38 S&W. I've loaded a 145gr/.361 LRN over 7gr. (by weight) of powder; ought to be a fair approximation of the 1877 load.
All of these loads user Triple-7 FFFg and CCI500 primers (except the .450 Adams, as noted below.) .32 S&W, 88gr LRN over 3.5gr., .32 Colt Long, 88gr heel-base RNL over 6.8gr., .32 S&W Long, 98gr LRN over 9.0gr., .38 S&W (per above)
I'm actually going the opposite direction with the .450 Adams shown; I've already done BP loads, now I am working on smokeless loads. This one is a 200gr. TCL over 4.5gr. of Unique. I'll be shooting it first in a .45 Colt revolver, and if velocity and recoil are OK I may try it in my Webley RIC.
For this series of tests I replaced the H&R with a S&W .38 Double Action 2nd Model with a 3-1/4" barrel, and this worked as you would expect, with the longer barrel yielding higher velocities.
We’ll start with listing the Winchester factory ammo for comparison.
Winchester 145gr. (modern) factory ammunition
S&W- 1-5/8″ barrel- 535 fps. 92 ft./lbs SD: 39
H&R- 3-1/4″ barrel- 478 fps. 74 ft./lbs SD: 42
Deeply unimpressive, and one of the reasons for this became plain when I pulled several of the bullets to try a different load under them. They are not .361″. They are not .357″. They average .352″! This was consistent across all fifteen bullets that I pulled, and may go a ways towards explaining the results of this first load-
Winchester 145gr RNL, 2.8gr. Unique, CCI500 primer
S&W 3-1/4″ barrel- 540 fps. 94 ft/lbs SD: 28
This performance is similar to the results for firing the factory ammo through the 1-5/8″ gun last time, and the bullets keyholed at 7 yards. I didn’t even bother to test them out of the shorter gun. Next…!
160gr. .361 LSWC, 2.7gr. Unique, CCI500 primer
S&W 3-1/4″ barrel- 754 fps. 202 ft./lbs SD: 24
S&W 1-5/8″ Barrel- 722 fps. 185 ft/lbs SD: 31
This load, while still considered safe for top-break revolvers, doubles the power of the factory load, and is my new defensive load for this caliber. I will restrict this to my S&Ws, though. They are of high enough quality to handle this load, but even they won’t be getting it as a steady diet; there’s simply no need to risk beating up an antique gun when practice and recreational shooting can be accomplished with milder loads.
This week I'll be testing some Triple-7 FFFg (a black powder substitute) loads intended to replicate the original performance of some old cartridges, including .38 S&W. I've loaded a 145gr/.361 LRN over 7gr. (by weight) of powder; ought to be a fair approximation of the 1877 load.
All of these loads user Triple-7 FFFg and CCI500 primers (except the .450 Adams, as noted below.) .32 S&W, 88gr LRN over 3.5gr., .32 Colt Long, 88gr heel-base RNL over 6.8gr., .32 S&W Long, 98gr LRN over 9.0gr., .38 S&W (per above)
I'm actually going the opposite direction with the .450 Adams shown; I've already done BP loads, now I am working on smokeless loads. This one is a 200gr. TCL over 4.5gr. of Unique. I'll be shooting it first in a .45 Colt revolver, and if velocity and recoil are OK I may try it in my Webley RIC.